|
|
...ambiguity is pervasive; but the conscious experience
of ambiguity is quite rare. [Baar]
The
illusion to your left has eight different perspectives or ways of
delineating relative positions. Some people with study will be able
to see all eight perspective and others will not. Even those who
can see the different views will have trouble holding some in mind
and getting them to come to mind when they want to evoke them. In
some ways, this illusion, because of its multiple perspectives,
provides the best concrete example of what lay people refer to as
personality. The personality of an individual person is based on
the attitudes and behaviors that they convey to others in various
situations. Some attitudes and behaviors will only become apparent
in certain situations, while others will be fairly obvious at all
times.
The difference between the illusion and life, is that the illusions
is much less complex. "...a structure such as the cerebral
cortex is indeed immensely complex, containing by recent estimates
55,000,000,000 neurons, each firing off an electrochemical pulse
40 - 1000 times per second, with rich subcortical and contralateral
connections, and all apparently active at the same time" (Montcastle,
1978). While the illusion has eight perspectives, people obviously
have many more. People create mental representations of almost everything
they experiences, and these mental representations are combined
and separated regularly. Thus even in the most rigid personality,
we would have more than eight perspectives, although a rigid person
would have fewer perspectives than a flexible person. Rigid people
tend to group experiences into very strong views [beliefs] and hold
to those perspectives despite evidence to the contrary.
... established presuppositions tend to become unconscious. Whatever
we believe with absolute certainty we tend to take for granted.
....We lose sight of the fact that alternatives to our stable presuppositions
can be entertained. [Baar]
Despite [or perhaps because of] the difference in complexity, the
use of the illusion to make a point, may be helpful. Depending on
the perspective you are seeing at a given time and how much emotional
value you give to it; you can take positions. For example, I might
talk about placing something upon the platform made by the stack
of cubes that I see in the illusion. And most of you might immediately
know what I am talking about. On the other hand I might see only
the six pointed star and be quite upset that many of you don't notice
it. Depending upon whether my perspective matches what most of you
happen to be seeing at the moment, I might be considered "normal"
or "odd".
In fact, simple reference points can make communication quite ambiguous.
A reference to a 'bank', without any other context may not be understood.
Many will place that term within the context of finance, while a
simple contextual reference to water might change the meaning significantly.
Similarly we can prime our linguistic understanding by using words
such as volume or arrest before the word 'book". Such priming
effects occur in sensation, perception and comprehension and are
pervasive. Some of you may not have seen the star and/or the stacked
cubes before it was brought to your attention. In fact, it has been
suggested that without priming [context], we cannot not even experience.
'It seems that the human mind has first to construct forms independently
before we can find them in things ...knowledge cannot spring from
experience alone, but only from a comparison of the inventions of
the intellect with observed facts.' --Albert Einstein [1949]
We continually utilize a host of such contextual processes, without
experiencing them as conscious experiences. The mental representations
which are conceptual abstractions provide the basis upon which we
experience. People and personalties have many facets and much of
human behavior is unpredictable. However, certain traits of perspective
or ways of contextualizing may be observed in individuals over time
and form a paradigm or world perspective, or if we may, a personality.
To make the point as clearly as possible we will offer these traits
simplistically and in the extreme. Some people have sad, fearful,
angry paradigms or the converse. Thus we refer to people as being
hostile or depressed. What we are really saying is that they have
so absorbed a single perspective, that they cannot see the star
for the cubes, much less see other perspectives. It does no good
to argue with them about an experience since their frame of reference
or perspective is on that which we do not understand. What is more,
they often don't even experience what you are trying to say. Until
we enter into their perspective or 'inner logic', communication
is inhibited if not extinct.
Each of us has these perspectives and tend to fall into a habitual
ways of experiencing the world. Most of us can see more than one
of the eight perspectives of the illusion, although without priming,
we may miss some. In order to develop our own creativity, we find
that we need to find ways to experience the world from new perspectives.
The gurus of creative thinking such as de Bono and Nierenberg all
provide tools to help you shift perspective. De Bono's lateral thinking
and thinking hats deliberately try to help the person view the experience
differently. We can all benefit from an expansion of our thinking
perspectives both creatively and attitudenally. Seeking the humor
in every situation no matter how traumatic, is an exercise in changing
both perspective and personality. Seeking an understanding of the
other persons' emotional status [empathetic thinking] changes perspective
- 'walk a mile in their shoes". Challenging our own position
and actively debating against it can help to shape new experiences.
When we talk about the development of the human mind we are talking
about processes of self-transformation: processes by which we turn
ourselves into different beings. However, in stressing self-transformation
we should never forget that this is not a solitary effort. We are
dependent in the most crucial ways on the help of others. And others
may hinder or constrain us also. [Donaldson]
We have created who we are by the perspective groups or paradigms
that we have adopted. The cliche of the brothers [same genes] who
grow up in "Hells Kitchen" [same environment] and one
becomes a cop and one becomes a thief epitomizes a difference in
perspective. The good news is that we now understand how these perspectives
interactively develop and how they can be influenced. The bad news
is that we continue to react to the perspective of others from our
own perspectives. If we believe that people with problems in living
are 1) chemically imbalanced, 2) bad people, 3) irritating, or 4)
all of the above we probably cannot help them. For if they are chemically
imbalanced, we must drug them; if bad, we must punish them, and
if they are irritating, we must put them away from us.
...paradigms are conceptual contexts. If one tried to make a paradigm
conscious, one could only make one aspect of it conscious at any
one time because of the limited capacity of consciousness. But typically
paradigm-differences between two groups of scientists involves not
just one, but many different aspects of the mental framework simultaneously.
[Baar]
WHAT IS YOUR PERSPECTIVE?
"I know that most men, including those at ease with problems
of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest
and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit
the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining
to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and which
they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives.
Leo Tolstoy [As Reported by James Gleick, 1987]
|